I have been reading with concern about the Tiree Array and as a visitor to Tiree for the past twenty years I hope you
do not mind if I use An Tirisdeach to ask a few questions as I am now more confused than before with more
questions than answers so would welcome any and all comments to a few simple questions.
Firstly on the subject of vested interests in this project I can understand how this project primarily benefits a Spanish
developer, Scottish Power Renewables, and the Crown Estates but I am not certain I understand whom else are
beneficiaries as the one extremely important group that under current legislation have absolutely no entitlement to
any compensation or any rights whatsoever are the good people of Tiree.
2 What measures are planned to protect the people and heritage of Tiree from the inevitable human impact on its
fragile Island community and heritage, exactly how many people will be moving to the Island and will they bring
children for the school and new permanent residents or is it proposed that there is just a fleet of transitory migrant
workers to build and maintain the wind farm. Will MacLeod’ s have a new Polish food section as does our local
Tesco’ s to accommodate the islands’ new guests.
3 Transport is always an issue in the islands and Cal-Mac often struggles to service the people and businesses of
Tiree as it is, so how will Cal-Mac cope with the hugely increased demands for freight and people for the new Array.
Will they build a new ferry, build better facilities or inevitably just struggle on with more delays, cancellations and
problems for the beleaguered residents, businesses and visitors of Tiree. How will the roads cope with the huge
increase in demand, or can I assume of course that Argyll council is ready, willing and just waiting to repair, restore
and rebuild the islands’ roads, very much as they do today.
4 If the Tiree Trust is the definitive representative voice of the whole island community I am not certain I
understand why full trust membership is limited to only full time residents, surely all those that own land on the Island
including holiday home owners who have a large financial stake on the Island should also be allowed some level of
5 As the development is deemed offshore, the people of Tiree apparently absolutely have no right to be consulted,
have absolutely no right to any compensation and are thus entirely reliant on the goodwill of a Spanish developer
and any promises of the Scottish Government to protect the interests and future of the Island and its people. I can
find no comments online from SEPA or SNH, the two institutions whose apparent primary function is to protect and
look out for fragile environments and communities like Tiree. Nor can I find any comment from the Duchy of Cornwall
whose leader has been very vocal previously about onshore wind farm developments.
The Tiree Trust and other groups are working hard and doing a great job to highlight individual issues and keep
everybody informed but might it be time for a local referendum of all concerned people including residents, nonresident
landowners and even the greater readership of An Tirisdeach to establish the wishes and concerns of the
people and friends of Tiree.
6 Whilst I fully support renewable energy, the question is at what cost. Tiree fishermen will lose significant fishing
grounds, Crofters disruption to their livestock and grazings, Visitors will hardly want to stay at Turbine View and if
history is correct the developers will bypass the local businesses to use national hauliers and suppliers, and
islanders with have to compete for jobs with the partners of the temporary residents.
7 – What will be the legacy of this project as it only has a proposed working life of some twenty years and
notwithstanding the damage to the community and heritage of Tiree will the island and the seas around Tiree be
littered with post wind farm wrecks, derelict buildings and general debris to add to the visually highly attractive legacy
of the last transitory residents from the last war.
Finally I would like to remind everybody that this is an election year so until the 5th May is the only time if you are
very lucky you might just get an MSP to talk to or listen to you, though good luck on that one.
Category Archives: Letters To The Editor
Dear Sir – Confusion over SPR’s “flawed” Tiree Survey
The recent questionnaire that was completed by many islanders and others has come in for heavy criticism. No Tiree Array (NTA) has taken professional advice on Scottish Power Renewables’ (SPR) questionnaire, and the conclusion is that the questionnaire appears to be so incompetently designed that the results may be corrupted and inadmissible. The only way for SPR to find out the island’s real issues is to conduct a survey, yet the survey’s questionnaire has already decided what the issues are!
With regard to question 7, the questionnaire tries to find out what concerns people have about the Tiree Array. There appear to be serious mistakes in the way the question is asked. The list is made up of arbitrarily selected items (eg noise, impact on business, disruption from the construction) covering only 10 of the things that might matter to residents. For instance, not one of the items touches on the cultural, community, or way- of- life impacts of the project. The one item in the list that comes anywhere near to this is “potential social effects of the windfarm”, which is then explained as “e.g. newcomers to the island”! Although a space exists for “other”, (I.e. you can add an issue that is important to you but not on the list), you are only allowed to give a view on three including “other”. Suppose there are more than 3 which you are concerned about? Tough. SPR have evidently decided for themselves that these ten plus one are the issues, and that 3 is the most that anyone can have strong feelings about.
Professional researchers know that the correct way to find out what people think and feel about something is to offer them a range of responses that they can chose from. We have all received surveys at one time or another, and we are used to this sort of question: “Please tick one box to indicate how you feel about xyz”. And then the boxes are labelled something like “very happy” “quite happy” “neither happy nor unhappy” “quite unhappy” “very unhappy”. It is done so that you learn how strongly the person feels about something. The SPR survey ignores this basic rule of research. Naively, it simply asks ”What are you most concerned about? Tick a maximum of three”.
These worries about the Tiree survey have been repeatedly brought to the attention of every one of SPR’s directors. SPR have replied that “your suggestions will be incorporated into any further questionnaires”, thus effectively acknowledging their mistakes. You might think they would therefore withdraw or re-run the survey. But no such luck. We have even offered to help them with experienced research advice. Again, no luck.
The frightening possibility is that SPR see nothing wrong in collecting, publishing and relying upon allegedly corrupted and invalid data, yet SPR want us to believe that their “consultation process” is transparent, thorough and professional.
To quote from the Guidelines of UK Renewables, of which the Regulations and Markets Director of Scottish Power is the Chairman, “These methods (gathering information, opinion surveys,…questionnaires….) only gather information in response to the questions asked; they may miss opinions or concerns that are not asked about”. Why is this error so important? SPR will publish the results, not just to the islanders, but to the government, to Marine Scotland, to the media. They will presumably use the results as evidence of what matters most to local people about the Tiree Array. Depending on the results, they may even claim that only one , two or three issues are matters of concern to locals, or that “even these only mattered to x% of the respondents”. Far from gaining true insights into people’s worries – which in reality appear to be widespread, wide-ranging, and very major – they will reduce everything to a handful of items that they can then fix or smooth over. And they can quote this allegedly incompetent and invalid survey as proof that they have taken care of what we wanted.
Why should we care? This survey is not independently assessed, but is part of delivering SPR’s promised “consultation with stakeholders”. It will be used to help shape the outcome of the biggest and potentially most disastrous happening in our island’s history. Nothing questionable must be allowed to influence that outcome. We will continue to challenge SPR to be honest and professional. So watch this space.
Robert Trythall, NTA